Home Back

Mdcalc Pft Interpretation

Interpretation Based on Percent Predicted, Interprets PFT per MDCalc.

%

Unit Converter ▲

Unit Converter ▼

From: To:

1. What is PFT Interpretation?

Pulmonary Function Test (PFT) interpretation based on percent predicted values provides a standardized way to assess lung function by comparing an individual's results to predicted normal values based on age, height, gender, and ethnicity.

2. How Does the Interpretation Work?

The interpretation follows standard MDCalc guidelines:

Interpretation based on percent predicted values:
  • ≥80% — Normal lung function
  • 60-79% — Mild impairment
  • 40-59% — Moderate impairment
  • <40% — Severe impairment

Explanation: This classification system helps clinicians quickly assess the severity of pulmonary impairment and guide further diagnostic and therapeutic decisions.

3. Importance of PFT Interpretation

Details: Accurate PFT interpretation is essential for diagnosing respiratory conditions, monitoring disease progression, assessing treatment effectiveness, and evaluating preoperative risk.

4. Using the Interpreter

Tips: Enter the percent predicted value from pulmonary function testing. The value should represent the percentage of the predicted normal value for the measured parameter (typically FEV1, FVC, or DLCO).

5. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: Which PFT parameters are most commonly interpreted?
A: FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second), FVC (Forced Vital Capacity), and DLCO (Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide) are the most commonly interpreted parameters.

Q2: How are predicted values determined?
A: Predicted values are based on large population studies and are adjusted for age, height, gender, and sometimes ethnicity.

Q3: When is PFT testing indicated?
A: PFTs are indicated for evaluating respiratory symptoms, monitoring known lung diseases, preoperative assessment, and occupational health screening.

Q4: Are there limitations to percent predicted interpretation?
A: Yes, interpretation should consider the clinical context, pattern of abnormalities, and changes over time rather than a single percentage value alone.

Q5: Should this replace clinical judgment?
A: No, this tool provides guidance but should be used in conjunction with comprehensive clinical assessment by a qualified healthcare professional.

Mdcalc Pft Interpretation© - All Rights Reserved 2025